Patricia Mirawati Susilo and Bryan Artawijaya Susilo of Applecross, are required to publish statements on their website, www.sellhouseseasy.com.au, clarifying the nature of their business and clearly outlining the purchasing and rental arrangements for the properties they are advertising for sale under the scheme.
The Court’s decision requires the brother and sister to make the terms of their contracts clearer to consumers in relation to the ownership of the property and the purchasing arrangements between the owner and prospective buyer/tenant.
They must also provide purchasers with a notice setting out a payment schedule and timeframe, as well as outlining the consequences should the buyer/tenant not be in a position to purchase the property at the end of the contract period.
Claims in their advertising that a loan from a bank or other financial institution is not required to purchase the homes will need to be qualified with “Bank or other financial institutions aren’t required to assist in all cases”.
The injunctions prevent the promoters from representing that they own or have interests in properties unless they are the owner or have the represented interest. They must also indicate that the sale price and instalment payments being advertised are approximate amounts only.
The injunctions are in force until a trial of the action takes place. In addition to alleging that the Susilos are engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct, Consumer Protection also alleges that they are operating as real estate agents without the required licence.
Commissioner for Consumer Protection Anne Driscoll said the injunctions will give greater clarity to those who might be considering this particular scheme.
“The Supreme Court’s decision acknowledges the need for greater clarity about these complex rental and purchase arrangements and the need for both parties to know their rights and financial obligations before signing any contracts,” Ms Driscoll said.